Munn v. Galaxy Cafe, Inc.
| Roy Munn |
| Galaxy Cafe, Inc. and City of Savannah |
| 4:2021cv00308 |
| October 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Roy Munn. City of Savannah waiver sent on 10/22/2021, answer due 12/21/2021. (Monismith, Pete) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Roy Munn (Monismith, Pete) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to City of Savannah. (slt) |
| Filing 7 Summons Submitted (Monismith, Pete) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against City of Savannah, filed by Roy Munn.(Monismith, Pete) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Galaxy Cafe, Inc. (JH) |
| Filing 4 Summons Submitted (Monismith, Pete) |
| Filing 3 Notice to All Counsel of Record: Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (jlh) |
Filing 2
RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/18/2021. (jlh)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Galaxy Cafe, Inc., filed by Roy Munn. (Fee paid: Receipt # AGASDC-3209064, $402.00.) (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet.) (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
