Carter v. Effingham County Sheriff's Department et al
| Gary Anthony Carter, Jr. |
| Effingham County Sheriff's Department, Winston Mock, Wellpath, Sergeant Lockett, E.S.C.O., Medical and Sergeant Over Booking |
| 4:2022cv00288 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| R Stan Baker |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Lockett waiver sent on 1/12/2023, Answer due 3/13/2023. (gmh) |
| Filing 15 USMS Service Remark - Certificate of Service was signed by name not legible on 1/17/23. (wwp) |
| Filing 14 Letter from Gary Carter, Jr. (pts) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance due by 2/11/2023. (wwp) |
Filing 13
ORDER Directing USMS Service of Process re #1 Complaint, #12 Amended Complaint, and this Order upon Defendants Mock and Lockett by the United States Marshal without prepayment of cost. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 01/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Mock - 285 Form, #2 Lockett - 285 Form.) (jlh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/12/2023: #3 GAS398 AO399) (wwp). (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2023: #4 AO399 GAS398) (wwp).
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance re printing service packets due by 1/14/2023. (jlh) |
| Filing 12 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Lockett, Winston Mock, filed by Gary Anthony Carter, Jr.(pts) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER denying #10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The deadline in the Court's #8 Order is vacated in part. Carter is directed to submit his Amended #1 Complaint no later than February 3, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 01/09/2023. (jlh)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/3/2023. (jlh) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Gary Anthony Carter, Jr. (loh) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE TO ORDER in reference to #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Gary Anthony Carter, Jr. (loh) |
|
Filing 8
VACATED IN PART. (See #11 Order.) ORDER directing Plaintiff to submit an Amended Complaint; ORDER Directing Payments be made from Prison Account of Gary Anthony Carter, Jr. Plaintiff owes an initial filing fee of $38.00. (Amended Complaint due by 1/20/2022.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 12/21/2022. (gmh) Modified on 1/9/2023 (jlh).
|
| Judge District Judge R. Stan Baker no longer assigned to case. (loh) |
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Gary Anthony Carter, Jr. (loh) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT by Prisoner Gary Anthony Carter, Jr to collection of fees. (loh) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. PLRA due by 12/23/2022.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 12/9/2022. (ca)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER re Magistrate Assignment. Plaintiff Statement Re Assignment Due on 12/21/2022. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 12/07/2022. (Attachment: #1 Party's Statement Form.) (jlh)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Gary Anthony Carter, Jr. Responses due by 12/21/2022. (Attachment: #1 Inmate Account Statement.) REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray. (jlh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants, filed by Gary Anthony Carter, Jr. (jlh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
