Penick v. Jpay/Securus.co et al
| Anthony Ramon Penick |
| Jpay/Securus.co and Georgia Department of Corrections |
| 4:2022cv00298 |
| December 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| William T Moore |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable - No Record. Mail #2 Notice of Deficiency sent to Anthony Ramon Penick on 12/15/2022. (kjm) |
Filing 5
ORDER that the Clerk is directed to transfer this case re #1 Complaint to the Waycross Division for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 12/19/2022. (ca)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Compliance (signature page) due by 12/29/2022. (kjm) |
| Filing 4 Inmate Account Statement by Anthony Ramon Penick. (gmh) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony Ramon Penick. Responses due by 12/29/2022. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray. (gmh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #1 Complaint. Pleading is not signed. After 14 days a notice of noncompliance will be submitted to a judicial officer for possible sanctions, to include dismissal. (gmh) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/15/2022: #1 Signature page) (gmh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Anthony Ramon Penick. (gmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
