Smith v. Wilcher et al
Brandon Smith |
Sheriff John T. Wilcher and Chatham County Detention Center |
4:2023cv00283 |
September 28, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
J Randal Hall |
Christopher L Ray |
Prisoner - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the U.S. Magistrate Judge that re #1 Complaint should be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 11/29/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 11/15/23. (loh) |
Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Brandon Smith. (wwp) |
Filing 9 CONSENT by Prisoner Brandon Smith to collection of fees. (wwp) |
![]() |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandon Smith. Responses due by 11/13/2023. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(ca) |
![]() |
![]() |
Set Deadlines: Compliance re #5 Order due by 10/31/2023. (ca) |
Filing 4 Supplemental MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandon Smith. Responses due by 10/30/2023. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray. (gmh) |
![]() |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandon Smith. Responses due by 10/12/2023. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray. (pts) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Brandon Smith.(pts) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.