Sokolowski v. The Fresh Market, Inc. et al
Susan Sokolowski |
John Doe and The Fresh Market, Inc. |
4:2024cv00170 |
August 5, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
R Stan Baker |
Christopher L Ray |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ANSWER to Amended Complaint by The Fresh Market, Inc..(Lovein, Norman) |
Filing 20 AMENDED COMPLAINT SUSAN SOKOLOWSKI against John Doe, The Fresh Market, Inc., filed by Susan Sokolowski.(Bergen, Frederick) |
![]() |
![]() |
Set Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/20/2024, re #19 Order. (amd) |
Filing 17 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Bergen, Frederick) |
Filing 16 MOTION Consent Motion to Drop Defendant Cassandre Rublowitz As A Party Defendant by Susan Sokolowski. Responses due by 9/25/2024. (Bergen, Frederick) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #16 MOTION Consent Motion to Drop Defendant Cassandre Rublowitz As A Party Defendant , #17 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (thb) |
![]() |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (thb) |
Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Bergen, Frederick) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. If action is required, after 14 days of noncompliance a notice will be submitted to a judicial officer for possible sanctions, to include dismissal. Compliance due by 9/12/2024. (thb) |
Filing 12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Bergen, Frederick) |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #12 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (thb) |
Filing 11 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Susan Sokolowski. (Bergen, Frederick) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.1) by Susan Sokolowski. (Bergen, Frederick) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Frederick S. Bergen on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Bergen, Frederick) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re #7 MOTION to Dismiss. (thb) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Cassandre Rublowitz, The Fresh Market, Inc.. Responses due by 8/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Briefs Brief ISO MTD)(Dunn, Bubba) |
Filing 6 Certificate of Related Cases 3.1. (pts) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cassandre Rublowitz, The Fresh Market, Inc. (pts) |
Filing 4 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Cassandre Rublowitz, The Fresh Market, Inc.. (pts) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Standing Order regarding cases pending before Chief District Judge R. Stan Baker. (#Click Here to View Standing Order) RULE 26(f) ORDER. Signed by Chief District Judge R. Stan Baker on 8/6/2024. (pts) |
Filing 2 REMOVAL NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD. Plaintiff's counsel intending to appear in this case must enter a notice of appearance within 10 days. Compliance due by 8/16/2024. (pts) |
Notice to All Counsel of Record : Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray has updated the Standard Procedures for Discovery Disputes and Settlement Conferences, Notice of Discovery Dispute Form and Request for Settlement Conference Form. #CLICK HERE TO READ. (pts) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Cassandre Rublowitz, The Fresh Market, Inc. from State Court of Chatham County, case number STCV24-01551. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BGASDC-3876421), filed by Cassandre Rublowitz, The Fresh Market, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Service Docs, #4 Fresh Market Answer, #5 Rublowitz Answer)(pts) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.