Obendorfer v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Diane J. Obendorfer
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 5:2008cv00009
Filed: January 24, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County: Brantley
Presiding Judge: James E. Graham
Presiding Judge: William T. Moore
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 21 Report and Recommendations, This case is remanded to the Commissioner, pursuant to Sentence four.. Signed by Chief Judge William T. Moore on 3/27/09. (wwp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Obendorfer v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diane J. Obendorfer
Represented By: Earl Daniel Smith, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?