Gandy v. Bryson et al
| Kasim Gandy |
| Homer Bryson, Tom Gramiak, Edwina Johnson, John Boyett, Nathan Brooks, William Steedly, Austin Adams, Kimberly Lowe and Cox |
| 5:2016cv00044 |
| June 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Waycross Office |
| Ware |
| R. Stan Baker |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 102 , granting 88 Motion for Summary Judgment, and dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff is denied in forma pauperis status on appeal. Clerk is directed to enter judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 3/26/19. (slt)
|
|
Filing
102
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court GRANT Defendant's unopposed 88 MOTION, DISMISS Plaintiff's 1 Complaint, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENY Plaintiff in forma pauperis status on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 3/21/2019). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 3/7/2019. (csr)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 59 . 66 Motion for Reconsideration is denied. 70 Motion for District Court to Rule on Motion for Intervention is denied as moot. Daker is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/31/17. (slt)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 47 and 65 on 34 Motion to Dismiss and 21 Motion to Dismiss. Motions to dismiss are granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's claims against Adams, Johnson and Boyett are dismissed in their entirety. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/31/17. (slt)
|
|
Filing
59
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that Waseem Daker be denied leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Any party seeking to object is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 6/30/2017.) ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 6/16/17. (slt)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING 10 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court and OVERRULES Plaintiff's Objections. Accordingly the Court DENIES Plaintiff's 6 Motion for TRO/Preliminary Injunction and request for decla ratory judgment. However, Plaintiff's states plausible Fourteenth Amendment due process claims against Defendants Tom Gramiak, Edwina Johnson, John Boyett, Nathan Brooks, William Steedly, Austin Adams, Kimberly Low, and Unite Manager Cox as a pl ausible First Amendment claim against Defendant Adams. Those claims shall proceed. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's monetary damages claims against Defendants in their official capacities, all claims against Defendant Bryson, all punitive and compensatory damage claims, and Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 9/12/2016. Modified on 9/12/2016 (ca).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
