Acosta Loja v. Perry et al
Case Number: 5:2017cv00034
Filed: March 30, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Waycross Office
County: Charlton
Presiding Judge: Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 . Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed without prejudice. Clerk is directed to enter judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/24/17. (slt)
September 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS without prejudice Loja's 1 Petition, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case, and DENY Acosta Loja in forma pauperis status on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 10/3/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/19/2017. (csr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acosta Loja v. Perry et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?