Meskel v. Simon

Meskel v. Simon

Petitioner:	Tedros Afrhom Meskel
Respondent:	Heath Simon
Case Number:	5:2017cv00041
Filed:	April 24, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office:	Waycross Office
County:	Charlton
Presiding Judge:	R. Stan Baker
Presiding Judge:	Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 23, 2017	Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING 12 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Meskel's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and DENIES Petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/23/2017. (ca)
August 29, 2017	Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS without prejudice Meskel's 1 Petition, and DIRECT the Clerk to CLOSE this case. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Meskel leave to proceed in forma pauperis o n appeal. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 9/12/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 8/29/2017. (ca)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 23, 2017

Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING 12 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES without prejudice Meskel's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and DENIES Petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to CLOSE this case and to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 10/23/2017. (ca)

August 29, 2017

Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS without prejudice Meskel's 1 Petition, and DIRECT the Clerk to CLOSE this case. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Meskel leave to proceed in forma pauperis o n appeal. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 9/12/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 8/29/2017. (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Meskel v. Simon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Tedros Afrhom Meskel
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Heath Simon
Represented By:	Bradford Collins Patrick
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?