Li v. Gartland
||Yang Jie Li
||September 15, 2017
||US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
||R. Stan Baker
||Lisa G. Wood
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2241
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 5, 2017
ORDER ADOPTING 4 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMSSES Petitioner's Petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court DENIES Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 12/5/2017. (ca)
|October 25, 2017
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS this action without prejudice and DIRECT the Clerk to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. It is furth er RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ORDERED to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which th is Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 11/8/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. The Court STAYS the deadline for Respondent to show cause as to why the Court should not grant Petitioner's writ set forth in the Court's 10/6/17 Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 10/25/2017. (ca) Modified on 10/25/2017 (ca).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?