Harrell v. Walmart, Inc.
| Angela Harrell |
| Walmart, Inc. doing business as Walmart Supercenter |
| 5:2020cv00139 |
| November 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Waycross Office |
| Benjamin W Cheesbro |
| Lisa G Wood |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Adopt the Previous Consent Confidentiality Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 01/05/2021. (MG)
|
|
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 1/8/2021. Discovery due by 2/16/2021. Motions due by 5/14/2021. Pretrial Order due by 6/15/2021. Expert Witness Report (Plaintiff) due by 3/15/2021. Expert Witness Report (defendant) due by 4/15/2021. Status Report due by 5/3/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 12/22/20. (slt)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Restriction of Discovery Related Materials re: 5 Certificate of Service. (csr) |
| NOTICE of Hearing: Telephonic Status Conference set for 5/5/2021 01:30 PM in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro. Dial-in instructions will be provided by Courtroom Deputy Clerk prior to scheduled call. (KM) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED: #6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (csr) |
| Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting and MOTION to Adopt the Previous Consent Confidentiality Order. (Thomas, Bradford). Modified on 1/5/2021 (MG). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradford W. Thomas on behalf of Angela Harrell (Thomas, Bradford) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD re #1 Notice of Removal. Compliance re Attorney Appearance for Plaintiff due by 11/20/2020. Statement of Pending Motions due by 11/24/2020. (MG) |
|
Filing 2
RULE 26(f) INSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 11/10/2020. (MG)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of Coffee County, Georgia, case number SUV2020000340. (Filing fee- $400, receipt number AGASDC-2962450), filed by Walmart, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-H: Superior Court Pleadings: Complaint, Summons, Affidavit of Service, Order Dismissing Less Than All Parties, 5.2 Certificate and Discovery Materials, Answer and Affirmative Defenses, Consent Confidentiality Order, Incident Report, Declaration of Leslie Becknell, and Response to First Interrogatories, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). Modified on 11/12/2020 (MG). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harrell v. Walmart, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart, Inc. doing business as Walmart Supercenter | |
| Represented By: | Leslie P. Becknell |
| Represented By: | Garret W. Meader |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angela Harrell | |
| Represented By: | Bradford W. Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
