Clue v. Greenawalt et al
O'Neil Richard Clue |
Daniel Greenawalt, Francisco Madrigal, Tae D. Johnson, Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick Garland |
5:2021cv00080 |
December 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Benjamin W Cheesbro |
Lisa G Wood |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Daniel Greenawalt on January 10, 2022, filed by O'Neil Richard Clue. (Repko, III, William) |
![]() |
MOTIONS REFERRED: #3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Kathleen S. Cornett Fee Amount $200. (JH) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Kathleen S. Cornett Fee Amount $200, by O'Neil Richard Clue. Responses due by 12/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order of Admission)(Repko, III, William) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/14/2021: #3 Statement Regarding Prior Cases) (JH). |
PRO HAC VICE PAID for Kathleen S. Cornett; Amount $200, Receipt # BWK011391. Date: 12/13/2021 (gmh) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Merrick Garland, Daniel Greenawalt, Tae D. Johnson, Francisco Madrigal, Alejandro Mayorkas. (gmh) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by O'Neil Richard Clue. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2) (gmh) |
Filing fee received: $5, receipt number BWK011388. (gmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.