Brown v. Astrue
Plaintiff: John M. Brown
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 6:2008cv00086
Filed: September 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County: Bulloch
Presiding Judge: B. Avant Edenfield
Presiding Judge: G. R. Smith
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:1383 Review of HHS Decision

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting 14 Motion for Attorney Fees and costs under EAJA in the amount of $1,474.30. This award shall be paid directly to counsel. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 6/16/2009. (mah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John M. Brown
Represented By: Daniel Lewis Wilder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?