Smith v. Owens et al
| Braja Smith |
| Brian Owens, Bruce Chatman, Larry Bruton, Steve Upton and John Paul |
| 6:2012cv00107 |
| November 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Bulloch |
| James E. Graham |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 17 Motion to Dismiss; adopting re 22 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 5/29/2013. (loh)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER directing Plaintiff to file any objections to the 17 Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss, or to otherwise inform the court of his decision not to object to Defendants' motion within twenty-one days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is hereby instructed to attach a copy of Rule 41, FED. R. CIV. P., as well as Rule 12, FED. R. CIV. P., to the copy of this Order that is served on the Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 3/12/2013. (csr)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER directing United States Marshal Service of Complaint and a copy of this Order; generally, a defendant who timely returns the waiver is not required to answer the complaint until sixty days after the date that the marshal sent the request for waiver. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 12/26/2012. (csr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
