Garmom v. Paul et al
| Charles Kevin Garmom |
| Larry Brewton, John Paul and Bruce Chatman |
| 6:2013cv00059 |
| May 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Bulloch |
| James E. Graham |
| B. Avant Edenfield |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 12 Motion to Dismiss; adopting re 16 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge B. Avant Edenfield on 2/6/14. (bcw)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER directing Plaintiff to file any objections to the 12 Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss, or to otherwise inform the court of his decision not to object to Defendants' motion within twenty-one days of the date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to attach a copy of Rule 41, FED. R. CIV. P., as well as Rule 12, FED. R. CIV. P., to the copy of this Order that is served on Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 11/5/2013. (csr)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER directing the United States Marshal to serve a copy of Plaintiff's Complaint and a copy of this Order upon Defendants Paul, Brewton, and Chatman. Generally, a defendant who timely returns the waiver is not required to answer the complaint until sixty days after the date that the marshal sent the request for waiver. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 6/28/2013. (csr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
