Lorenzo v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
| Ramiro Gonzales Lorenzo, Jr. and Maribel Lorenzo Molina |
| Georgia Department of Corrections, Stanley Williams, Jarrod D. Pittman, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 |
| 6:2016cv00011 |
| January 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Tattnall |
| J. Randal Hall |
| G. R. Smith |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 38 Motion for Discovery. The parties may elect to take the depositions of inmates Richard Duron, Eduardo Nava, and Luis Hernandez-Moreno by working with the wardens. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 8/8/17. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting Defendants' 15 Motion to Dismiss; instructing the Clerk to terminate the Georgia Department of Corrections and John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 as parties in this case; and determining that only Plaintiffs' claim against Williams and Pittman in their individual capacities for their alleged Failure to protect Lorenzo, which Defendants did not move to dismiss, will proceed. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 3/8/2017. (jah)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 16 Motion to Stay discovery pending the resolution of Defendants' motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 3/22/16. (wwp) Modified on 3/22/2016 (wwp).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
