San Miguel Produce, Inc. v. L.G. Herndon Jr. Farms, Inc.
| San Miguel Produce, Inc. |
| L.G. Herndon Jr. Farms, Inc. |
| 6:2016cv00035 |
| March 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| Bulloch |
| J. Randal Hall |
| G. R. Smith |
| Commercial/ICC Rates/etc. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. This case is closed. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 1/27/21. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 61 Herndon Farms' Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 66 San Miguel Produce, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court ORDERS Herndon Farms' to file its written submissions, as set forth in footnote 2, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on December 10, 2020. (jrb)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER Certifying the aforementioned questions for resolution by the Supreme Court of Georgia. The Court ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSES and STAYS this case until such time as the Supreme Court of Georgia renders its answers to the certified questions herein . The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to transmit each party's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and all related filings-including briefs, attachments, fact statements, declarations, etc.-to the Supreme Court of Georgia to assist its conside ration of the certified questions presented. re 66 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Roy L. Nishimori, San Miguel Produce, Inc., Janis Berk, 61 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Partial) filed by L.G. Herndon Jr. Farms, Inc. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 9/11/19. (jrb)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting 27 Motion to Consolidate Cases. The Clerk is instructed to consolidate these cases. These cases will proceed under case number 616-035. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 12/06/2016. (thb)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER denying 5 Motion to Dismiss; denying 20 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 10/27/16. (cmr)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER granting 11 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice for attorney Annalise Peters. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 4/27/16. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
3
GENERAL ORDER: Report of Rule 26(f) planning meeting. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 3/28/2016. (loh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: San Miguel Produce, Inc. v. L.G. Herndon Jr. Farms, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: San Miguel Produce, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Nowell Donald Berreth |
| Represented By: | Annalise Peters |
| Represented By: | Amanda M. Waide |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: L.G. Herndon Jr. Farms, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Craig A. Stokes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
