Bradley v. Adams et al
Michael Paul Bradley |
Robert Adams, Jr. and State Of Georgia |
6:2018cv00059 |
May 31, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Statesboro Office |
Jenkins |
R. Stan Baker |
J. Randal Hall |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as the opinion of the Court. The Court DISMISSES 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus and DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENIES Plaint iff's in forma pauperis status on appeal. The Court also DENIES 13 Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum filed by Michael Paul Bradley. In addition, the Court DENIES the issuance of a COA. Signed by District Judge R. Stan Baker on 03/01/2019. (evk) |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Bradley's Petitions, DIRECT the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal, and DENY Bradley in forma pauperis status on appeal. An y party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 1/24/2019). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Benjamin W. Cheesbro on 1/10/2019. (csr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.