Hendrix v. Reed et al
| Michael Hendrix |
| Gates Reed, Barclay Black, Renata Newbill Jallow and State Of Georgia |
| Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only) |
| 6:2022cv00046 |
| June 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| J Randal Hall |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge that the re #1 28 U.S.C. 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus should dismissed. Petitioner should also be denied in forma pauperis status on appeal. Objections to R&R due by 7/13/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 6/29/22. (loh) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting re #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 6/29/22. (loh)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Hendrix. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(ca) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Deficiency re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Filing fee has not been paid. (csr) |
| Filing 2 Inmate Account Statement by Hendrix Michael. (csr) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Hendrix Michael. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (csr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/16/2022: #2 Petition) (csr). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
