Sands v. O'Malley
Matthew Trent Sands |
Martin O'Malley |
Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia |
6:2024cv00025 |
May 28, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Brian K Epps |
J Randal Hall |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Shannon Heath Statkus on behalf of Martin O'Malley (Statkus, Shannon) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Weaver on behalf of Martin O'Malley (Weaver, Mark) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 5/29/24. (loh) |
Filing 4 Litigants' Bill of Rights by Matthew Trent Sands. (loh) |
Filing 3 Disclosure Statement of Parties and Intervenors by Matthew Trent Sands. (loh) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Matthew Trent Sands. Responses due by 6/11/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)REFERRED to Judge Brian K. Epps.(loh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin O'Malley. This Notice of Electronic Filing constitutes service of the Complaint pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, filed by Matthew Trent Sands. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(loh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.