In the Matter of Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Guam District Court In the Matter of Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC

In the Matter of Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC

Petitioner:	Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC
Claimant:	Amy Hill
Case Number:	1:2011cv00032
Filed:	November 2, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Guam
Office:	Hagatna Office
Presiding Judge:	Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	46 U.S.C. § 741
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 25, 2014	Filing 212 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. In conclusion, the court finds that Petitioner knew (1) the Vessel was generally unseaworthy due to its aforesaid condition, (2) knew specifically of the unseaworthy conditions manifesting itself at the rudde r stock with an excessive and constant leak, (3) knew of the incompetency of the crew which lacked training, experience, a common language, communication skills, and basic emergency skills, and (4) knew that the Captain it provided the Majestic Blue was a mere figurehead-a ship master with no real authority. Because of its knowledge and because these were the unseaworthy conditions that caused the loss, Petitioner is not eligible to limit its liability. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joaquin V.E. Manibusan, Jr on 7/25/2014. (fad, )
June 11, 2014	Filing 207 Order denying 178 Motion to Compel Arbitration or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joaquin V.E. Manibusan, Jr. on 6/11/2014. (fad, )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 25, 2014

Filing 212 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. In conclusion, the court finds that Petitioner knew (1) the Vessel was generally unseaworthy due to its aforesaid condition, (2) knew specifically of the unseaworthy conditions manifesting itself at the rudde r stock with an excessive and constant leak, (3) knew of the incompetency of the crew which lacked training, experience, a common language, communication skills, and basic emergency skills, and (4) knew that the Captain it provided the Majestic Blue was a mere figurehead-a ship master with no real authority. Because of its knowledge and because these were the unseaworthy conditions that caused the loss, Petitioner is not eligible to limit its liability. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joaquin V.E. Manibusan, Jr on 7/25/2014. (fad, )

June 11, 2014

Filing 207 Order denying 178 Motion to Compel Arbitration or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joaquin V.E. Manibusan, Jr. on 6/11/2014. (fad, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In the Matter of Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Majestic Blue Fisheries, LLC
Represented By:	Robert D. Peltz
Represented By:	David Ledger
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Claimant: Amy Hill
Represented By:	Amber E. Ferry
Represented By:	Jon A. Visosky
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?