Aguero et al v. Calvo et al
Kathleen M. Aguero and Loretta M. Pangelinan |
Eddie Baza Calvo and Carolyn Garrido |
1:2015cv00009 |
April 13, 2015 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Guam |
Hagatna Office |
Guam |
Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 60 Order granting in part 43 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting in part 51 Motion for Attorney Fees. Defendants are hereby ordered to pay Plaintiffs the following: the sum of $66,462.50 for legal services provided by Thompson Thompson and Alcantara, P.C.; the sum of $16,380.00 for legal services provided by the Guam Family Law Office of William D. Pesch; the sum of $2,575.17 for related expenses incurred by Thompson Thompson and Alcantara, P.C. Defendants are further ordered that such payments be made within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 3/16/2016. (fad, ) |
Filing 39 Order granting 2 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The court PERMANENTLY ENJOINS the Territory of Guam and its officers, employees, agents, and political subdivisions from enforcing 10 G.C .A. § 3207(h), and any other laws or regulations to the extent they prohibit otherwise qualified same-sex couples from marrying in Guam. Said injunction shall take effect 6/9/2015 at 8:00 am. Signed by Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 6/8/2015. (vtk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.