United States of America for the use and benefit of Porges Electrical Group, Inc., a California Corporation v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America

Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Porges Electrical Group, Inc.
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Case Number: 1:2015cv00024
Filed: July 30, 2015
Court: Guam District Court
Office: Hagatna Office
County: Guam
Presiding Judge: Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood
Referring Judge: Joaquin V.E. Manibusan
Nature of Suit: Miller Act
Cause of Action: 40:3131
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America for the use and benefit of Porges Electrical Group, Inc., a California Corporation v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of Porges Electrical Group, Inc.
Represented By: Vincent Cristobal Camacho
Represented By: Elyze Josephine McDonald Iriarte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?