Atesom v. Guam Memorial Hospital Authority et al
| Tairin Atesom |
| Guam Memorial Hospital Authority and Theodore Lewis |
| 1:2015cv00038 |
| October 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Guam |
| Hagatna Office |
| Guam |
| Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood |
| Joaquin V.E. Manibusan |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
Decision and Order on Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Order granting 5 Motion to Dismiss; finding as moot 7 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting in part and modifying in part 17 Report and Recommendations. Atesom's Complaint is hereby dismissed, with leave to amend her third through fifth claims within 21 days of the date of this order. Signed by Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood on 9/30/2016. (vtk)
|
|
Filing
17
Report And Recommendations re 5 Motion to Dismiss pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) filed by Guam Memorial Hospital Authority, Theodore Lewis, 7 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Tairin Atesom. The undersigned recommends the Chief Judge gran t the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss on the grounds that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the action. The court lacks federal question jurisdiction because the Plaintiff has failed to meet her burden of showing that her claims &q uot;arise under" federal law. Second, the court lacks diversity jurisdiction because the parties are not citizens of different states and because the Plaintiff has failed to satisfy the jurisdictional amount requirement. Additionally, because t he court's finding that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction is dispositive, the court declines to address the arguments raised in the Defendants' motion and the Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Without subject ma tter jurisdiction over the claims, the court has no authority to grant the relief sought by the Plaintiff. Thus, the undersigned recommends the Plaintiff's cross motion be dismissed as moot. Objections to R&R due by 3/16/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joaquin V.E. Manibusan, Jr on 3/2/2016. (fad, ) **Modified on 3/3/2016 to edit docket text** (fad, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
