D.D. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana et al
D.D. |
Doe Individuals 6-50, Brother Gregory Seubert, F.M.S., Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana, Father Duenas Memorial School, Marist Brothers of the Schools and Doe Entities 1-5 |
1:2019cv00046 |
April 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Guam |
Joaquin VE Manibusan |
Frances M Tydingco-Gatewood |
P.I.: Other |
28:1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Summons Issued as to Marist Brothers of the Schools. (fad, ) |
Filing 6 Transmittal of Record from the Superior Court of Guam (fad, ) |
Filing 5 Writ of Certiorari. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joaquin V.E. Manibusan, Jr on 5/22/2019. (fad, ) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 Minute Entry for proceedings held on 4/25/2019. Joint Status Conference before Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood and Superior Court Judge Michael J. Bordallo. Stay extended until July 1, 2019. Court to provide list of possible settlement judges by 5/3/2019. Continued Status hearing set for 6/27/2019 at 8:30 a.m. (Court Reporter Veronica Flores.) (fad, ) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal filed by Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana from Superior Court of Guam, case number CV1107-18. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0993-472045), filed by Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana. Scheduling Notice due to be issued by 5/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Superior Court Case)(Terlaje, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.