K.S. v. Capuchin Franciscans et al
| K.S. |
| Boy Scouts of America Aloha Counsel Chamorro District, Boy Scouts of America, Capuchin Franciscans Custody of Star of the Sea, Capuchin Franciscans, DOE Individuals 6-50, inclusive, DOE Entities 1-5 and Capuchin Franciscans, Province of St. Mary |
| 1:2019cv00134 |
| September 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Guam |
| Joaquin VE Manibusan |
| Frances M Tydingco-Gatewood |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Disclosure of Plaintiff's Name and Place of Residence filed by K.S. (fad, ) (fad, ). |
| Filing 3 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge (fad, ) |
| Summons Issued as to Boy Scouts of America, Boy Scouts of America Aloha Counsel Chamorro District, Capuchin Franciscans, Capuchin Franciscans Custody of Star of the Sea, Capuchin Franciscans, Province of St. Mary. (fad, ) |
| Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number GUX015708 re #1 Complaint, (fad, ) |
| Filing 2 Cover Sheet, filed by K.S..(Berman, Michael) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Damages - Jury Trial Demanded against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number PaymentDue.), filed by K.S.. Scheduling Notice due to be issued by 10/14/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Berman, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Guam District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
