Mamea et al v. United States of America
| Felise Mamea and Siuila Mamea |
| United States of America |
| 1:2008cv00563 |
| December 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice Office |
| Honolulu |
| HELEN GILLMOR |
| LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:1346 Tort Claim |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
215
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 181 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 9/16/2011. ~ Defendants Motion forReconsideration for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, f iled March 24, 2011, is HEREBY DENIED. As to the portion of the Motion addressing Haw. Rev. Stat. § 657-7.3. On May 31, 2011, the Court issued an order which, inter alia, denied the other argument in the Motion. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on 9/19/2011
|
|
Filing
206
ORDER ADOPTING 202 MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING UNITED STATES' OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS' BILL OF COSTS. Signed by District JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on July 7, 2011. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
190
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S 177 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT; AND ORDER DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND SETTING: "Defendant's Motion for Relief from Judgment , filed March 8, 2011, is HEREBY DENIED, and Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, filed March 24, 2011, is HEREBY DENIED IN PART. The Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED as to the request to reconsider the Court's ruling regarding the timeliness of Plaintiffs' claims under the Federal Torts Claims Act. The Court RESERVES RULING on the portion of the Motion for Reconsideration addressing Defendant's Haw. Rev. Stat. § 657-7.3 arg ument and ORDERS the parties to appear at a hearing on that portion of the Motion for Reconsideration on June 21, 2011 at 9:45 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED." Signed by District JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on May31, 2011. (bbb, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
175
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER: "AND NOW, following the conclusion of a bench trial in this matter, and in accordance with the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is HEREBY ORDERED that judgment shall ente r in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant in the above matter in the amount of $7,378,872.57 to Plaintiff Siuila Mamea and $150,000.00 to Plaintiff Felise Mamea The Court ORDERS Defendant to pay these amounts to Plaintiffs, via Plainti ffs counsel, by no later than sixty days after the entry of judgment in this case. If there are any post-judgment motions, Defendant shall pay these amounts by no later than forty-five days after this Court has ruled on the post-judgment motions. If there are any appeals from the judgment in this case, Defendant should move for a stay of the judgment pending the resolution of the appeal. If these awards are affirmed on appeal, Defendant shall pay these amounts by no later than thirty days after the final resolution of this case on appeal, including any petitions for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. IT IS SO ORDERED." Signed by District JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on February 18, 2011. (bbb, )CER TIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 44 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E KOBAYASHI on 8/23/2010. ~ Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for Summa ry Judgment, filed May 5, 2010, is HEREBY DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
