Cramer v. City and County of Honolulu et al
| David Cramer |
| City and County of Honolulu, Henry Eng, State of Hawaii, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10, Doe Corporations, Doe Partnerships 1-10 and Doe Government Entities 1-10 |
| 1:2009cv00223 |
| May 18, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| KEVIN S.C. CHANG |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HENRY ENG'S MOTION TO DISMISS 14 , 15 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 6/23/10. ("The court grant s both the City's motion for summary judgment and Eng's motion to dismiss the Complaint. No other Defendants having appeared in this case, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment for Defendants and to close the case.") (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. A copy of this order has been served by First Class Mail to Barry Sooalo, Esq. at the address of record on June 23, 2010.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
