Katz v. Geithner
Plaintiff: Norman Katz
Defendant: Timothy F. Geithner
Case Number: 1:2009cv00599
Filed: December 16, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Presiding Judge: ALAN C KAY
Presiding Judge: LESLIE E KOBAYASHI
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 102 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND DECISION. Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY on 03/04/2013. (eps)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on 03/05/2013
January 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER DENYING BOTH PARTIES' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 17 , 21 . Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY on 1/21/11. (eps )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
February 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 ; 3 . Signed by JUDGE ALAN C KAY on 2/1/10. (eps ) -- "Findings and Recommendations To Deny Plaintiff's Application To Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs" are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications will be served by first class mail on 02/02/2010
January 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS re 3 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E KOBAYASHI on 1/13/10. (eps ) -- this Court FINDS that Plaintiff does not qualifyas a person who is unable to pay or give security for court fees. The Court therefore RECOMMENDS that the district judge DENY Plaintiff's Application CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants reg istered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Katz v. Geithner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norman Katz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy F. Geithner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?