Austin v. Lau
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 21, 2012
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO APPEAL 22 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 2/21/12. (" In light of Plaintiff's pro se status, the Clerk is DIRECTED to nonetheless process Plaintiff's request as his n otice of appeal. Plaintiff may then direct his request for an extension of time to appeal to the appellate court.") (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notific ations received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Gerald Lewis Austin served by first class mail at the address of record on February 21, 2012. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals received the order electronically. Modified on 2/21/2012 (emt, ).
|November 30, 2011
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND DISMISSING ACTION 8 ; 9 ; 11 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 11/30/11. (" Austin's Motion to File Amended Complaint is DENIED. Austin's action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2)(b) & 1915A(b)(1). This dismissal may be counted as strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). All pending motions are DENIED.") (emt, )C ERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Gerald Lewis Austin served by first class mail at the address of record on November 30, 2011.
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?