Moddha Interactive, Inc. v. Philips Electronics North America, Inc. et al
||Moddha Interactive, Inc.
||Does 1-20 and Philips Electronics North America Corporation
||January 13, 2012
||US District Court for the District of Hawaii
||BARRY M. KURREN
||SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 10, 2015
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S THIRD THROUGH SIXTH CAUSES OF ACTION re 136 - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE BARRY M. KURREN on 3/10/2015. "The Court finds that MODDHA's claims of f raud and unfair competition do not escape UTSA preemption, and are preempted under either the HUTSA or the CUTSA. The Court further finds that MODDHA's trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract claims are barred by the applicable s tatutes of limitations, and the assertions contained in MODDHA's Second Amended Complaint, when read with the required liberality, are insufficient to prove that the applicable limitation periods were tolled. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Phi lips' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Through Sixth Causes of Action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (Doc. 136)." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants r egistered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?