PAMCAH-UA Local 675 Trust Funds, Trustees of the et al v. Kaimuki Plumbing Company, Ltd.

Plaintiff: PAMCAH-UA Local 675 Trust Funds, Trustees of the and Francis Chun
Defendant: Kaimuki Plumbing Company, Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2012cv00272
Filed: May 18, 2012
Court: Hawaii District Court
Office: Hawaii Office
County: Honolulu
Referring Judge: UNASSIGNED
Presiding Judge: RICHARD L. PUGLISI
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29:1131
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PAMCAH-UA Local 675 Trust Funds, Trustees of the et al v. Kaimuki Plumbing Company, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PAMCAH-UA Local 675 Trust Funds, Trustees of the
Represented By: James K. Tam
Represented By: Shellie K. Park-Hoapili
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francis Chun
Represented By: Shellie K. Park-Hoapili
Represented By: James K. Tam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kaimuki Plumbing Company, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.