Bank of New York Mellon v. Navarro et al
| Bank of New York Mellon |
| John Does 1-20, Jane Does 1-20, Doe Corporation 1-20, Doe Entities 1-200, Ernesto S. Navarro, Maria A. Navarro and Doe Governmenttal Units 1-20 |
| 1:2012cv00292 |
| May 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Maui |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re 13 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 9/24/12. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Ernesto S. Navarro and Manmeet Rana, Esq. shall be served by first class mail at the addresses of record on September 25, 2012.
|
|
Filing
13
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND BE GRANTED re 10 - Signed by Judge BARRY M. KURREN on 9/7/12. (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Manmeet Rana, Esq. and Ernesto S. Navarro served by first class mail at the addresses of record on September 7, 2012.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
