Gregg v. State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety
||State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, Ted Sakai and Neal Wagatsuma
||January 31, 2014
||Hawaii District Court
||KEVIN S.C. CHANG
||J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 18, 2014
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS STATE OF HAWAII, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, TED SAKAI IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF HAWAII, AND NEAL WAGATSUMA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS WARDEN OF THE KAUAI COMMUNITY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF HAWAII, IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, DOC. NO. 19; AND (2) GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, DOC. NO. 27 re 19 ; 27 - Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 8/18/2014. For the foregoing reasons, the court GRANTS State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Doc. No. 19; and GRANTS Wagatsuma, in his individual capacity's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Because this dismissal is without leave to amend, the court directs the Clerk's Office to close the case file." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to re ceive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.