Field v. Hinahara et al
||Dane S. Field
||Dennis I. Hinahara and Myra S. Hinahara
||October 8, 2014
||US District Court for the District of Hawaii
||KEVIN S.C. CHANG
||J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 0157
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 5, 2015
CERTIFIED QUESTION; ORDER CERTIFYING QUESTION OF LAW FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 3/5/2015. (afc)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipan ts registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry. A certified copy of the instant order and a certified copy of the case docket will be served this date by first class mail addressed to the Office of the Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii.
|February 20, 2015
ORDER (1) RULING ON QUESTION OF LAW REGARDING THE "FRAUD ON THE PARTNERSHIP" EXCEPTION, AND (2) REQUESTING COMMENT ON FORM OF QUESTION TO BE CERTIFIED TO THE HAWAII SUPREME COURT. Signed by JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 2/20/2015. (af c) re: 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?