Hamamoto et al v. Abercrombie et al
| Eugene Hamamoto and John P. Roco |
| Neil Abercrombie, Democratic Party of Hawaii, Brian Schatz, Scott T. Nago, Joy Allison, Campbell Cavasso, Harry J. Friel , Jr., Colleen Wakako Hanabusa, Michael Kokoski, Eddie Pirkowski, Arturo Pacheco Reyes and Brian Evans |
| 1:2014cv00491 |
| October 30, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| BARRY M. KURREN |
| DERRICK K. WATSON |
| Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS COMPLAINT; (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM; AND (3) DENYING DEFENDANT BRIAN EVANS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS. ~ the Court GRANTS both the State Defen dants' Motion to Dismiss and Senator Brian Schatz's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaim filed by Brian Evans is GRANTED, and Evans Motion for Sanctions is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 31 34 47 63 64 . Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 2/23/2015. (ecs, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
