Lake v. Ohana Military Communities, LLC
Kenneth Lake, Crystal Lake, Harold Bean, Melinda Bean, Kyle Pahona, Estel Pahona, Timothy Moseley and Ashley Moseley |
Ohana Military Communities, LLC, Forest City Residential Management, Inc. and Doe Defendants 1-10 |
1:2016cv00555 |
October 13, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
Hawaii Office |
Honolulu |
LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI |
KENNETH J. MANSFIELD |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 187 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT NO. 1 AND NO. 2 re: 145 , 150 - Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 9/30/2019. (jo) |
Filing 159 ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' Motion For Reconsideration of Order Dismissing Plaintiffs' Unfair Competition Claim re 141 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 6/13/2019. (cib) |
Filing 155 ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification re 127 . On the basis of the foregoing, Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification, filed March 22, 2019, which is CONSTRUED as a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, is HEREBY DENIED. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 5/31/2019. (cib) |
Filing 131 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 4/2/2019. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to file their response to this Order to Show Cause by April 12, 2019. Show Cause Response due by 4/12/2019. (emt, ) |
Filing 98 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [DKT 75 ] re 76 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 05/31/2018. Defenda nts' Motion to Dismiss and/or Strike Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint [Dkt 75], filed October 4, 2017, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Motion is GRANTED insofar as: Plaintiffs' UDAP and UMOC claims are STRICKEN; Pl aintiffs' Haw. Rev. Stat. Chapter 521 claim alleging a violation of Haw. Rev. Stat. § 521-42(a)(1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; the Beans' nuisance claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and the Moseleys' nuisance claim is DISMISSED W ITH PREJUDICE. The Motion is DENIED in all other respects.Defendants are ORDERED to file their answer(s) to the remaining portions of the First Amended Complaint by June 29, 2018. This Court EMPHASIZES that the filing of any motion for reconsider ation of this Order will not affect the deadline for Defendants' answer(s). If a motion for reconsideration is filed and granted, this Court will allow Defendants to amend their answer to the First Amended Complaint, if necessary.IT IS SO ORDERED (eps, ) |
Filing 81 ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFFS' TRESPASS CLAIM. Excerpt of order:Count X of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, i.e. Plaintiffs' trespass claim, is HEREBY STRICKEN. The 10/12/17 Order dismissi ng Count X of Plaintiff's original Complaint without prejudice still stands. Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 12/20/2017. (afc) 10/12/2017 Order: ECF 78 : "ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS 9; MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS" CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). All participants are registered to receive electronic notifications. |
Filing 78 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS re 64 MOTION for Reconsideration re 63 . Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 10/12/2017. Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, filed August 15, 2017, is HEREBY GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Th e Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED insofar as: the portion of this Court's August 1, 2017 order dismissing Plaintiffs' trespass claim with prejudice is WITHDRAWN; Plaintiffs' trespass claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and Plai ntiffs may file a motion seeking leave to file an amended trespass claim. Plaintiffs must file the motion by October 27, 2017. The Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED in all other respects. (eps, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.