Ah Puck v. Werk et al
| Hardy K. Ah Puck, Jr. |
| Kenton S. Werk, Craig Hirayasu and Peter T. Cahill |
| 1:2017cv00154 |
| April 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Maui |
| KENNETH J. MANSFIELD |
| DERRICK K. WATSON |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b) re 1 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 5/2/2017. "(1) The Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b). (2) Plaintiff may file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies noted above on or before June 9, 2017. Failure to cure these deficiencies may result in dismissal of this action and Plaintiff may incu r a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (3) The Clerk is directed to mail Plaintiff a prisoner civil rights complaint form so that he can comply with the directions in this Order." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF S ERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Hardy K. Ah Puck, Jr. served by first class mail at the address of record on May 2, 2017. A copy of the courts' prisoner civil rights complaint form has been included in the mailing to Mr. Ah Puck.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
