Chadwick v. SBMC Mortgage et al
| Bruce Kent Chadwick |
| SBMC Mortgage and any Alleged "Un-Noticed" "New Creditor" |
| 1:2017cv00178 |
| April 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1640 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, ECF NO. 12 . Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 8/9/2017. (afc)Excerpt of conclusion: "Although it appears that any amendment would be futile, the c ourt cannot say so with certainty. As such, the court gives Plaintiff leave to file a supplemental memorandum, of no more than five pages, setting forth a description of any amended claims that he believes he could bring that would not be barred b y the doctrine of res judicata as applied in this order. That supplemental memorandum must be filed by September 8, 2017. Failure to file a supplemental memorandum by that date will result in dismissal of this action."***Deadlin e set: (Status Report (Supplemental Memorandum) due by 9/8/2017.)CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Participants not registered to receive electronic notifications were served by first class mail on the date of this docket entry.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
