Kapu v. Attorney General, State of Hawaii et al
| Mo'i Kapu |
| Attorney General, State of Hawaii, Hawai'i, State of and Bureau of Conveyances, State of Hawaii |
| 1:2017cv00213 |
| May 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| DERRICK K. WATSON |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS ON APPEAL re 15 , 18 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 11/16/2017. "Accordingly, the Court revokes Appellants IFP status." (emt, )CERTIF ICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Mo'i Kapu shall be served by first class mail to the address of record on November 17, 2017. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals served electronically re 9CCA No. 17-17310. Modified on 11/16/2017 (emt, ).
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE; (2) DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY AND/OR PERMANENT INJUNCTION; (3) DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RECEIVER; AND (4) DISMISSING CASE re 11 , 12 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 10/6/2017. " Based upon the foregoing, the Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without further leave to amend. All pending Motions are DENIED. The clerk of court is directed to close the case." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Moi Kapu served by first class mail at the address of record on October 6, 2017.
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND re 7 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 8/2/2017. "Based upon the foregoing, the First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with limited leave to amend. Mo'i Kap u is once more granted limited leave to file an amended complaint in accordance with the terms of this order by no later than September 1, 2017. The Court CAUTIONS Mo'i Kapu that failure to file an amended complaint by September 1, 201 7 will result in the automatic dismissal of this action without prejudice." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Mo'i Kapu served by first class mail to the address of record on August 2, 2017.
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER (1) GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES OR COSTS; AND (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND re 2 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 5/15/2017. "Based upon the foregoing, the Complaint is DISMISS ED with limited leave to amend, and the IFP Application is GRANTED. Mo'i Kapu is granted limited leave to file an amended complaint in accordance with the terms of this order by no later than June 9, 2017. The Court CAUTIONS Mo&# 039;i Kapu that failure to file an amended complaint by June 9, 2017 will result in the automatic dismissal of this action without prejudice." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Mo'i Kapu served by first class mail at the address of record on May 15, 2017.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
