Thompson v. Torres et al
| Thad Thompson |
| Katherine Torres, Paleka, Residency Dept. Supervisor (John Doe), High Kitchen Supervisor (Jane Doe) and Law Library Supervisor (Jane Doe) |
| 1:2017cv00319 |
| July 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| RICHARD L. PUGLISI |
| DERRICK K. WATSON |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER Denying Motion For Reconsideration re 68 . Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 11/7/2018. (cib, )COURTS CERTIFICATE of Service - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 50 , 63 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 8/22/2018. Defendant Michael Bala's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and this action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file and enter judgment. Any pending motions are denied. (emt, )
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF re 41 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 5/9/2018. (emt, )
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER DISMISSING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN PART AND DIRECTING SERVICE re 18 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 11/21/2017. " (1) The Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED IN PART. Thompson's Eighth Amendment cla im and his claim against Nurse Mike in his official capacity are DISMISSED with prejudice. Thompson's retaliation claim against Nurse Mike in his individual capacity shall proceed and be served. (2) The Clerk is DIRECTED to send th e documents detailed above to the United States Marshals Service who shall effect service on Nurse Mike. (3) After service is effected, Nurse Mike SHALL file a response to the Second Amended Complaint." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Thad Thompson shall be served by first class mail to the address of record on November 22, 2017.
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)and 1915A(a) re 10 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 10/4/2017. "(1) The Complaint is DISMISSED IN PART for failure to state a claim pursuant t o 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A(a). (2) Thompson's claims as alleged under the Eighth Amendment, and ALL claims as alleged against Defendants Katherine Torres, Captain Paleka, Nolan Uehara, Residency Department Supervisor John Doe, and Law Library Supervisor Jane Doe regarding Thompson's May 2017 disciplinary proceedings, housing decisions, and access to legal paper work or photocopies, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (3) Thompson's retaliation claim again st Nurse Mike is DISMISSED with leave granted to amend on or before November 4, 2017. Failure to cure the deficiencies in this claim will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice and Thompson shall incur a strike pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 1915(g). (4) The Clerk is directed to mail Thompson a prisoner civil rights complaint form so that he can comply with the directions in this Order." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Thad Thompson served by first class mail to the address of record on October 4, 2017. A copy of the court's prisoner civil rights complaint form shall be included in the mailing to Mr. Thompson.
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT IN PART AND DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re 1 , 3 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 8/2/2017. " (1) The Complaint is DISMISSED IN PART for failur e to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) and 1915A(b). Specifically, Count I as alleged against Katherine Torres states a claim and may proceed. Thompson's claims in (1) Count I as alleged against Captain Paleka and Jane Does 1-2, and Count II as alleged against Katherine Torres, Captain Paleka, and John Doe Residency Department Supervisor are DISMISSED with leave to amend. (2) Thompson may file an amended complaint on or be fore September 5, 2017. (3) In the alternative, Thompson may NOTIFY the Court in writing on or before September 5, 2017, that he will stand on his retaliation claim in Count I as alleged against Katherine Tor res only. If Thompson chooses this option, his remaining claims against Defendants will be dismissed with prejudice and the Court will order the U.S. Marshal to serve the Complaint at Thompson's direction on Defendant Torres only. (4) Thompson's Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (5) The Clerk is directed to mail Thompson a prisoner civil rights complaint form so that he can comply with the directions in this Order if he chooses to amend his pleadings. Thompson is NOTIFIED that failure to use the court's complaint form for any amended pleading may result in the document being stricken." (emt, )CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEParticipants registered to receive electronic notifications received this document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Thad Thompson served by first class mail to the address of record on August 2, 2017. A copy of the court's prisoner civil rights complaint shall be included in the mailing to Mr. Thompson.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
