Annan-Yartey v. State of Hawaii Department of Transportation Airport et al
| Napoleon T. Annan-Yartey, Sr. |
| State of Hawaii Department of Transportation Airport, Securitas Security Service USA, Inc., John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10, Corporation 1-10 Does, Partnership 1-10 Does, Governmental Entities 1-10 and Department of State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, Sheriff Division (DIS) |
| 1:2018cv00107 |
| March 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| Honolulu |
| HELEN GILLMOR |
| KENNETH J. MANSFIELD |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT, FILED JULY 16, 2018 (ECF NO. 31 ) - Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 9/13/2018. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 31) is GRANTED< /B>. Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims pursuant to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment of the United Sta tes Constitution are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Section 1983 claims pursuant to the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court declines to assert supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims. The Clerk of Court is ordered to CLOSE THE CASE. (emt, )
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO: (1) DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH LIMITED LEAVE TO AMEND; AND (2) DENY PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS (ECF NO. 23 ) AS MODIFIED - Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 7/12/2018. The filings entitled "Second Amended Complaint" (ECF No. 25 ) and "Amended Copy Second Amended Complaint" (ECF No. [2 6]) ARE STRICKEN. Plaintiff is given leave to amend his First Amended Complaint. In order to be clear as to the sequence of his complaints, the new complaint shall be entitled Third Amended Complaint. The Third Amended Complai nt must cure the deficiencies of his claims as specified in the Findings and Recommendation, as modified, adopted by this Order. The Third Amended Complaint must be filed on or before Monday, August 27, 2018. Failure to timely amend an d cure the pleading deficiencies noted herein will result in dismissal of this action with prejudice for failure to state a claim. (emt, )COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - Napoleon T. Annan-Yartey, Sr. served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on July 12, 2018.
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 5 - Signed by JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 5/10/2018. The Court specifies that the Plaintiff has leave to file an Amended Complaint by no later than Tue sday, June 12, 2018, to address the deficiencies outlined in the Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 5 ). Further, if Plaintiff files an Amended Complaint, Plaintiff must also pay the filing fee or file an In Forma Pauperis applicati on no later than Tuesday, June 12, 2018. (emt, )COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - Napoleon T. Annan-Yartey, Sr. served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of E lectronic Filing (NEF) on May 11, 2018. Filed copies of the Amended Complaint and IFP application, "received" on May 1, 2018 were included in the mailing to Mr. Annan-Yartey. Modified on 5/11/2018 (emt, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
