Gordon v. USA

Gordon v. USA

Petitioner:	Kenneth Scott Gordon
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	1:2018cv00198
Filed:	May 22, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office:	Hawaii Office
County:	Honolulu
Presiding Judge:	KEVIN S.C. CHANG
Presiding Judge:	J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 27, 2020	Filing 6 ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT'S REMANDED MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE BY A PERSON IN FEDERAL CUSTODY; AND (2) DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 3/27/2020. (CR 11-00479(01) JMS; CV 18-00198 JMS-KSC) (jo)
October 29, 2018	Filing 4 ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION UNDER § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE, ECF NO. (272); AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY ~ as to KENNETH SCOTT GORDON. Signed by CHIEF JUDG E J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 10/29/2018. (afc) Order denies Kenneth Scott Gordon's Motion under § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence filed in CR 11-00479-JMS-01 as ECF (272). Order further denies as moot Kennet h Scott Gordon's MOTION to Strike filed as ECF (283) in said criminal numbered case. Written Order entered in the instant case and in CR 11-00479-JMS. COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEA copy of the instant order will be served on October 30, 2018 by first class mail to the address of record for Kenneth Scott Gordon.

Date Filed

Document Text

March 27, 2020

Filing 6 ORDER (1) DENYING DEFENDANT'S REMANDED MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE BY A PERSON IN FEDERAL CUSTODY; AND (2) DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 3/27/2020. (CR 11-00479(01) JMS; CV 18-00198 JMS-KSC) (jo)

October 29, 2018

Filing 4 ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION UNDER § 2255 TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE, ECF NO. (272); AND (2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY ~ as to KENNETH SCOTT GORDON. Signed by CHIEF JUDG E J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 10/29/2018. (afc) Order denies Kenneth Scott Gordon's Motion under § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence filed in CR 11-00479-JMS-01 as ECF (272). Order further denies as moot Kennet h Scott Gordon's MOTION to Strike filed as ECF (283) in said criminal numbered case. Written Order entered in the instant case and in CR 11-00479-JMS. COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICEA copy of the instant order will be served on October 30, 2018 by first class mail to the address of record for Kenneth Scott Gordon.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gordon v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Thomas J. Brady(Designation Government)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth Scott Gordon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?