Sheehan v. Southern Foods Group, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Douglas M. Sheehan
Defendant: Dean Foods Company and Southern Foods Group, LLC
Case Number: 1:2018cv00405
Filed: October 22, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Presiding Judge: HELEN GILLMOR
Referring Judge: KENNETH J MANSFIELD
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2018 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Douglas M. Sheehan. Southern Foods Group, LLC. served 12/12/2018 (Harimoto, Ryan) Modified on 12/18/2018 (emt, ).
December 3, 2018 Filing 9 EO: To allow sufficient time for counsel to serve the complaint and for parties to conduct the meeting of the parties, the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference previously set for 12/17/2018 IS CONTINUED TO 01/18/2019 at 9:30 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD. Scheduling conference statements are due by 01/11/2019. Counsel Ryan K. Harimoto to notify the parties. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD)(bbb)
October 23, 2018 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Dean Foods Company. (emt, )
October 23, 2018 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Southern Foods Group, LLC. (emt, )
October 22, 2018 Filing 6 Summons (Proposed) (Harimoto, Ryan)
October 22, 2018 Filing 5 Summons (Proposed) (Harimoto, Ryan)
October 22, 2018 Filing 4 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet ~ Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 AO 398 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons, #2 AO 399 Waiver of Service of Summons) (emt, )
October 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:30AM on 12/17/2018 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 10/22/2018. (Attachments: #1 Memo from Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosure Statements) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT. (emt, )
October 22, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 18-00405 HG-KJM on all further pleadings. (emt, )
October 22, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Douglas M. Sheehan ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2107986.), filed by Douglas M. Sheehan.(Harimoto, Ryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sheehan v. Southern Foods Group, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dean Foods Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Southern Foods Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas M. Sheehan
Represented By: Ryan K. Harimoto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?