Pint v. Johnson Mark, LLLC
Meilani Pint |
Johnson Mark, LLLC |
1:2019cv00028 |
January 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
KENNETH J MANSFIELD |
DERRICK K WATSON |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 EO: Due to a conflict in the Court's schedule, the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference previously set for 03/18/2019 IS CONTINUED TO 03/28/2019 at 9:30 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD)(bbb) |
Filing 14 Scheduling Conference Statement . (Mark, William) |
Filing 13 Scheduling Conference Statement and Certificate of Service. (Brackett, Justin) |
Filing 12 INITIAL DISCLOSURE by Meilani Pint. (Brackett, Justin) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Defendant's FRCP 26(a)(1) INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Johnson Mark, LLLC. (Mark, William) Docket text modified on 3/7/2019 (emt, ). |
Filing 10 REPORT of Planning Meeting . (Brackett, Justin) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Johnson Mark, LLLC. (Mark, William) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Johnson Mark, LLLC.(Mark, William) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Meilani Pint. Johnson Mark, LLLC. served on 2/23/2019. (Brackett, Justin) Modified on 1/25/2019 (emt, ). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 19-00028 DKW-KJM on all further pleadings. (emt, ) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Defendant Johnson Mark, LLLC (jo) |
Filing 4 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet ~ Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons) (jo) |
Filing 3 Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 09:30 AM on 3/18/2019 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 1/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 Memo from Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosure Statement) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT.(jo) |
Filing 2 Summons (Proposed) (Brackett, Justin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Johnson Mark, LLLC ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2145164.), filed by Meilani Pint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Verification of Complaint & Certification, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brackett, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pint v. Johnson Mark, LLLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Johnson Mark, LLLC | |
Represented By: | William Albert Mark |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Meilani Pint | |
Represented By: | Justin A. Brackett |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.