The Estate of Dana `O Keakuako` Ulunakanawai Brown v. City and County of Honolulu, et al.
The Estate of Dana `O Keakuako` Ulunakanawai Brown, Mary Brown, Bruce Brown, Precious Brown and Kimberly Cambra-Tam |
City and County of Honolulu, John Doe 1, John Does 2-10, Jane Does 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10, Doe Partnerships 1-10 and Doe Unincorporated Organizations 1-10 |
1:2021cv00474 |
December 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
HELEN GILLMOR |
KENNETH J MANSFIELD |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 EO: At the parties #8 Request, the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is previously set for January 31, 2022 IS CONTINUED TO July 14, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD. Scheduling conference statements are due by July 7, 2022.In accordance with the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii's latest Temporary General Order Regarding District of Hawaii Response to COVID-19 Emergency and the Order Authorizing the Use of Telephonic and Video Hearings, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and public health emergency, including the anticipated long term need to maintain certain social distancing and other measures intended to protect the public, court employees, and counsel from being exposed to the COVID-19 virus, while at the same time regulating civil matters in a manner consistent with equity and fairness, the hearing will be held telephonically. Parties are to participate via telephone through our AT&T Service. Call-in information for this conference is below. Parties must connect to the conference at least five (5) minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the hearing.Dial in number is 1-877-848-7030Access Code is 2123668 (MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD)(bbb) |
Filing 8 LETTER from Page C.K. Ogata dated January 24, 2022 requesting continuance of the current Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. (bbb) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Precious Brown, Kimberly Cambra-Tam, Mary Brown, The Estate of Dana `O Keakuako` Ulunakanawai Brown, Bruce Brown. All Defendants City and County of Honolulu served 12/16/2021.. (Kau, Megan) Modified on 12/21/2021 (jo) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants (jo) |
Filing 5 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet ~ Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 AO 398 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons, #2 AO 399 Waiver of Service of Summons) (jo) |
Filing 4 Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 09:30 AM on 1/31/2022 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 12/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Memo from Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosures) ATTACH THE ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT.(jo) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil Case Number CV 21-00474 HG-KJM on all further pleadings. (jo) |
Filing 2 Summons (Proposed) (Kau, Megan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants The Estate of Dana `O Keakuako` Ulunakanawai Brown (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AHIDC-2615316), filed by The Estate of Dana `O Keakuako` Ulunakanawai Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kau, Megan) Modified on 12/1/2021 (jo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.