Pirtle v. Nago
| James Pirtle |
| Scott Nago |
| 1:2022cv00381 |
| August 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| WES REBER PORTER |
| J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
EO: Based on Defendant's pending #10 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with Prejudice, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, the Court CONTINUES the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference from 10/17/2022 to 11/28/2022 at 9:30 AM before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER via Zoom: Dial in number: 1-833-568-8864; Meeting ID: 161 0084 2470. The public may listen to the proceedings by dialing the Public Dial-in number at 1-650-479-3207 and entering Access code: 1601263445. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER) (jo)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - James Pirtle will be served by First Class Mail on October 12, 2022 to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically to the email addresses listed on the (NEF).
|
|
Filing 12
EO: "Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with Prejudice, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment," ECF No. 10, is set for hearing on November 7, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. in Aha Kaulike before the Honorable J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT. Plaintiff's Opposition is due by October 17, 2022, and Defendant's optional Reply is due by October 24, 2022. Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the court attaches a Notice to Pro Se Litigants regarding motions for summary judgment.(shm)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
Filing 11
CONCISE STATEMENT of Facts re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with Prejudice, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Scott Nago. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Compliance with Word Limitations, #2 Certificate of Service)(Nakamura, Reese)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with Prejudice, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment Reese R. Nakamura appearing for Defendant Scott Nago (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #2 Declaration of Scott T. Nago, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Certificate of Compliance with Word Limitations, #8 Certificate of Service)(Nakamura, Reese)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by James Pirtle. Scott Nago served on 9/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (jo)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S "EMERGENCY EX PARTE MOTION TO RETAIN AND PRESERVE EVIDENCE," ECF NO. #7 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 8/31/2022. The Motion for TRO fails under Rule 65 and fails to meet the applicable standard set forth in Winter. Accordingly, Plaintiff James Pirtle's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, ECF No. #7 , is DENIED. (jo)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - James Pirtle will be served by First Class Mail on September 1, 2022 to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF).
|
|
Filing 7
Request: Emergency Ex Parte MOTION to Retain and Preserve Evidence - by Plaintiff James Pirtle (Attachments: #1 Exhibit H) (jo) Modified on 8/29/2022 (jo)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to Scott Nago (jo)
|
|
COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - a copy of ECF No. #6 Summons Issued will be served by First Class Mail to James Pirtle at the address of record on August 25, 2022. (jo)
|
|
Filing 5
Filing fee received: $402.00; receipt number HI033276 re #1 Complaint (jo)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 10/17/2022 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 8/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memo from Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosures)(eta)
|
|
Filing 3
DEFICIENCY ORDER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 8/18/2022. (eta)
|
|
Filing 2
(Proposed) Summons - submitted by James Pirtle. (eta)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Scott Nago - filed by James Pirtle. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(eta)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pirtle v. Nago | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Pirtle | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Scott Nago | |
| Represented By: | Reese R. Nakamura |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
