Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant: John Doe Subscriber
Case Number: 1:2025cv00110
Filed: March 12, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii
Presiding Judge: ROM TRADER
Referring Judge: DERRICK K WATSON
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2025 Filing 7 Notice to Parties Re: Corporate Disclosure Statements: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Criminal Rule 12.4 both address the filing of Corporate Disclosure Statements. Both rules state A party must:(1) file the Rule 7.1(a) (or 12.4(a)) statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court, and (2) promptly file a supplemental statement upon a change in the information that the statement requires. (eta)
March 12, 2025 Filing 6 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet - Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(cib)
March 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 5/12/2025 at 09:00AM before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/12/2025. (cib)
March 12, 2025 Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment; Please reflect Civil case number CV 25-00110-DKW-RT on all further pleadings (cib)
March 12, 2025 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC.. (Kamau, Christian)
March 12, 2025 Filing 2 Report of the Filing or Determination Of An Action or Appeal Regarding A Copyright by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Kamau, Christian) Modified docket text on 3/12/2025 (cib).
March 12, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement; Demand for Jury Trial against John Doe Subscriber ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AHIDC-3128066.), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kamau, Christian) Modified on 3/12/2025 (jni)
March 12, 2025 COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of #2 Report of the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding A Copyright, #1 Complaint has been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record on Register of Copyright. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (cib)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe Subscriber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Christian Kamau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Subscriber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?