Stuart v. Fisher

Stuart v. Fisher

Petitioner:	Gene F Stuart
Respondent:	Greg Fisher
Case Number:	1:2002cv00020
Filed:	January 17, 2002
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	B. Lynn Winmill
Nature of Suit:	Death Penalty
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 27, 2013	Filing 149 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 139 is DENIED, and his Motion for Alternative Relief 139 is GRANTED. If Petitioner wishes to file a motion to file a second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, he shall do so within 60 days after entry of this Order. Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Amended Petition 137 is GRANTED. Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Motions for Evidentiary Development 141 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
September 5, 2012	Filing 126 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER conditionally granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion to Dismiss. The Court reserves its ruling whether procedurally defaulted claims will be dismissed with prejudice until later in this proceeding. The followin g claims will not be dismissed as procedurally defaulted: 2A (as limited herein), 5, 6, 7 (limited), 8 (deferred ruling), 10, 11, 13 (limited), 14-21, 22 (limited), 24A, 24C, and 27. Within 21 days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confe r on a proposed scheduling order for additional filings in this case and shall submit a joint proposed scheduling order to the Court, or shall submit proposed litigation plans separately if the parties cannot agree. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 27, 2013

Filing 149 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 139 is DENIED, and his Motion for Alternative Relief 139 is GRANTED. If Petitioner wishes to file a motion to file a second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, he shall do so within 60 days after entry of this Order. Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Amended Petition 137 is GRANTED. Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Motions for Evidentiary Development 141 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)

September 5, 2012

Filing 126 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER conditionally granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion to Dismiss. The Court reserves its ruling whether procedurally defaulted claims will be dismissed with prejudice until later in this proceeding. The followin g claims will not be dismissed as procedurally defaulted: 2A (as limited herein), 5, 6, 7 (limited), 8 (deferred ruling), 10, 11, 13 (limited), 14-21, 22 (limited), 24A, 24C, and 27. Within 21 days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confe r on a proposed scheduling order for additional filings in this case and shall submit a joint proposed scheduling order to the Court, or shall submit proposed litigation plans separately if the parties cannot agree. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stuart v. Fisher
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Gene F Stuart
Represented By:	Teresa A Hampton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Greg Fisher
Represented By:	L LaMont Anderson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?