Stuart v. Fisher
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 27, 2013
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 139 is DENIED, and his Motion for Alternative Relief 139 is GRANTED. If Petitioner wishes to file a motion to file a second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, he shall do so within 60 days after entry of this Order. Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Amended Petition 137 is GRANTED. Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Motions for Evidentiary Development 141 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|September 5, 2012
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER conditionally granting in part and denying in part 92 Motion to Dismiss. The Court reserves its ruling whether procedurally defaulted claims will be dismissed with prejudice until later in this proceeding. The followin g claims will not be dismissed as procedurally defaulted: 2A (as limited herein), 5, 6, 7 (limited), 8 (deferred ruling), 10, 11, 13 (limited), 14-21, 22 (limited), 24A, 24C, and 27. Within 21 days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confe r on a proposed scheduling order for additional filings in this case and shall submit a joint proposed scheduling order to the Court, or shall submit proposed litigation plans separately if the parties cannot agree. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjm)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?