Mingo v. American General Assurance Company
Plaintiff: Darrell Curtis Mingo
Defendant: American General Assurance Company
Case Number: 1:2008cv00380
Filed: September 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office: Insurance Office
County: Jerome - Southern
Presiding Judge: B. Lynn Winmill
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by jlg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mingo v. American General Assurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darrell Curtis Mingo
Represented By: Billie Jean Siddoway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American General Assurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?